{"id":303,"date":"2009-04-27T17:56:20","date_gmt":"2009-04-27T22:56:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/vgable.com\/blog\/2009\/04\/27\/dont-trust-time\/"},"modified":"2010-08-26T18:23:09","modified_gmt":"2010-08-26T23:23:09","slug":"dont-trust-time","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vgable.com\/blog\/2009\/04\/27\/dont-trust-time\/","title":{"rendered":"Don&#8217;t Trust TIME"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote><p>Technical problems can be remediated. A dishonest corporate culture is much harder to fix.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>\u2014<a href=\"http:\/\/www.schneier.com\/crypto-gram-0508.html#16\">Bruce Schneier<\/a><\/p>\n<p>UPDATE 2009-06-12: See also, <a href=\"\"><cite>The Top 10 Most Absurd Time Covers of The Past 40 Years<\/cite><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>BREAKING NEWS 2010-08-26: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theonion.com\/video\/time-announces-new-version-of-magazine-aimed-at-ad,17950\/\"><cite>The Onion: TIME Magazine Announces New Version of Magazine for Adults<\/cite><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Recently <a href=\"http:\/\/www.time.com\/time\/specials\/packages\/article\/0,28804,1883644_1886141,00.html\">The 2009 TIME 100 Finalists online-poll<\/a> was <a href=\"http:\/\/musicmachinery.com\/2009\/04\/15\/inside-the-precision-hack\/\">manipulated with hither-to unheard of sophistication<\/a>. Not only did hackers vote their choice into the #1 spot, but <strong>they stuffed the ballot so that the runners up spelled out a message!<br \/>\n<\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/musicmachinery.com\/2009\/04\/15\/inside-the-precision-hack\/\"><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align:center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/vgable.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/04\/kg9kl.jpg\" alt=\"kg9kl.jpg\" border=\"0\" width=\"450\" height=\"460\" \/><\/div>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.codinghorror.com\/blog\/archives\/001256.html\">Jeff Atwood called TIME&#8217;s web developers clowns<\/a>, but that seems too harsh to me, since online polls are so inherently untrustworthy that spending resources trying to secure them is almost always a waste. Even <em>if<\/em> all the technical problems could be solved, the results still wouldn&#8217;t be meaningful, because they wouldn&#8217;t be a census or a random sampling. An online poll is a way to engage readers, and let them do more than passively consume. TIME&#8217;s poll succeeded there, even if it was gamed. (Arguably it was more engaging because it was gamed).<\/p>\n<p>But today, April 27th, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.time.com\/time\/arts\/article\/0,8599,1894028,00.html\">TIME&#8217;s <em>writers<\/em> disingenuously denied the hack<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>TIME.com&#8217;s technical team did detect and extinguish several<br \/>\nattempts to hack the vote.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>When I <a href=\"http:\/\/www.schneier.com\/blog\/\">first heard news of the attacks<\/a>, it was already <a href=\"http:\/\/musicmachinery.com\/2009\/04\/13\/hacking-recommenders\/\">a week old<\/a>, TIME&#8217;s whitewashing came <em>two weeks<\/em> after the <em>results<\/em> of the hack were published. Portraying the hack as an &#8220;attempt&#8221; that was &#8220;extinguished&#8221; is just blatantly wrong.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m a big believer in <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hanlon's_razor\">Hanlon&#8217;s razor<\/a>: &#8220;never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.&#8221; But it&#8217;s very hard to give TIME&#8217;s staff the benefit of the doubt here, since <strong>by their own admission they were aware of the hack, and the poll results were &#8220;surprising&#8221;<\/strong>. It takes a <em>staggering<\/em> amount of stupidity not to connect the dots, or be aware of what was being written about you for weeks.<\/p>\n<p>Consequently, TIME has lost my trust. If their denial was written in stupidity, it shows an unforgivably incompetent journalistic ethic. If it was a deliberate whitewashing of the poll results, then it&#8217;s an even more egregious failure. Also, what kind of an article announcing the winner of a poll only has pictures of people who are <em>not<\/em> the winner? (Hint: something by the hacks at TIME)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Technical problems can be remediated. A dishonest corporate culture is much harder to fix. \u2014Bruce Schneier UPDATE 2009-06-12: See also, The Top 10 Most Absurd Time Covers of The Past 40 Years. BREAKING NEWS 2010-08-26: The Onion: TIME Magazine Announces New Version of Magazine for Adults. Recently The 2009 TIME 100 Finalists online-poll was manipulated [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[53,42],"tags":[97,81,401,402],"class_list":["post-303","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-announcement","category-security","tag-epic-fail","tag-internet","tag-journalism","tag-time-magazine"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/vgable.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/303","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/vgable.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/vgable.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vgable.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vgable.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=303"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/vgable.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/303\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":691,"href":"https:\/\/vgable.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/303\/revisions\/691"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/vgable.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=303"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vgable.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=303"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vgable.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=303"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}