<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just Look at it, Man!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vgable.com/blog/2009/11/11/just-look-at-it-man/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vgable.com/blog/2009/11/11/just-look-at-it-man/</link>
	<description>my weblog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:49:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Petersen</title>
		<link>http://vgable.com/blog/2009/11/11/just-look-at-it-man/comment-page-1/#comment-879</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vgable.com/blog/?p=495#comment-879</guid>
		<description>I probably look at tens to hundreds of graphs a day, for temporal data sets with time ranges measured in days and weeks. Multiple lines and hundreds of data points of various dimensional projections of our data set. I can sit here and reason about the results of a code change all I want, but nothing really compares to pushing a code change out and really jumping into the graphs. Seeing in what ways certain statistics change gives you an intuitive way of reasoning about correctness/performance/regression that no unit test can offer.

I don&#039;t know how many times I&#039;ve been called over (or called over people to my desk) for the question: &quot;Why does this look like this?&quot; Humans are astonishingly good at finding patterns, and impeccable at seeing/feeling where those patterns change. Often we&#039;ll know something&#039;s up way before any of the crude statistics (percentiles/averages) have technically changed significantly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I probably look at tens to hundreds of graphs a day, for temporal data sets with time ranges measured in days and weeks. Multiple lines and hundreds of data points of various dimensional projections of our data set. I can sit here and reason about the results of a code change all I want, but nothing really compares to pushing a code change out and really jumping into the graphs. Seeing in what ways certain statistics change gives you an intuitive way of reasoning about correctness/performance/regression that no unit test can offer.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how many times I&#8217;ve been called over (or called over people to my desk) for the question: &#8220;Why does this look like this?&#8221; Humans are astonishingly good at finding patterns, and impeccable at seeing/feeling where those patterns change. Often we&#8217;ll know something&#8217;s up way before any of the crude statistics (percentiles/averages) have technically changed significantly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

