<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Resolution Independence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vgable.com/blog/2008/03/31/resolution-independence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vgable.com/blog/2008/03/31/resolution-independence/</link>
	<description>my weblog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 17:13:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent Gable</title>
		<link>http://vgable.com/blog/2008/03/31/resolution-independence/comment-page-1/#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Gable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 01:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vgable.com/blog/2008/03/31/resolution-independence/#comment-579</guid>
		<description>March 9, 2009 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.useit.com/alertbox/kindle-usability-review.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jakob Nielsen finds the Kindle to be as fast as paper&lt;/a&gt;,
&lt;blockquote&gt;As an experiment, I bought two copies of the same book: a trade paperback and a Kindle download. Alternating for each chapter, I read half the book in print and half on the Kindle screen. &lt;strong&gt;My reading speed was exactly the same (less than 0.5% difference), measured in words per minute.&lt;/strong&gt;

Of course, one person reading one book is not a proper measurement study. So I can&#039;t say for sure that Kindle has finally reached the nirvana of equal readability for screens and paper. But it did feel that way.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>March 9, 2009 <a href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/kindle-usability-review.html" rel="nofollow">Jakob Nielsen finds the Kindle to be as fast as paper</a>,</p>
<blockquote><p>As an experiment, I bought two copies of the same book: a trade paperback and a Kindle download. Alternating for each chapter, I read half the book in print and half on the Kindle screen. <strong>My reading speed was exactly the same (less than 0.5% difference), measured in words per minute.</strong></p>
<p>Of course, one person reading one book is not a proper measurement study. So I can&#8217;t say for sure that Kindle has finally reached the nirvana of equal readability for screens and paper. But it did feel that way.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

